President Obama: A Better Legislator or Executive?

I was inspired by a talk show’s discussion this week on whether President Obama is a better legislator or executive as President thus far. I believe that he’s taken a strong role as a legislator, and struggled as an executive.

Going back through my notes from my American Presidency class, the President has four major functions. (1) Symbol – head of state (2) Policy Advocate (3) Mediator – He’s the only elected official with a national constituency and (4) Crisis Manager. I think he has been weak on two of the four.

Like it or not, President Obama has found legislative success, as far as creating new national laws. He’s reformed our healthcare system, passed a massive stimulus package, and is working with his Democratic Congress to pass climate control bills, banking legislation, reform to No Child Left Behind, among others. This is an ambitious list of potential law changes. With the Democratic Congress, this is probably a smart decision.

As a mediator, I give him a fairly poor review. He has attempted in a very public way to “talk” to Republicans and work with them on the healthcare legislation. However, there is no indication from the national media that Obama is working with Republicans on any of his current proposals. In addition, on the healthcare reform, he was a good enough of a mediator to get the votes needed on a very controversial piece of legislation. However, by all accounts on the healthcare reform legislation, the only working with Republicans occurred in the public setting, and not behind closed doors, where real agreements are made.

Obama has held the symbolic principals of the office. He’s gotten criticized for spending time with the US Soccer team before they left for South Africa because of the ongoing oil spill. It’s unfair to criticize Obama in that aspects. If there is any critique here, I think it is in his traveling and visiting other world leaders. He’s had one main speech and visit overseas. He ran on the platform of rebuilding the view of America overseas, and I would be interested in hearing anyone tell me what he has done to improve relations with other countries.

If I could grade Obama as a crisis manager, I would give Obama a generous D. Whether it be the tensions of North Korea/South Korea, the oil spill, the floods of Nashville, or the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, contend that he’s been an ineffective crisis manager. At the very least, on the public side of things, he’s been late or hasn’t responded swiftly enough in my opinion. With the wars, as the Commander-in-Chief, he should visit our troops that are sacrificing everyday for all of us.

It’s clear that off-the-cuff speeches, spontaneous moments, and unscripted moments are not what President Obama is comfortable with. That’s okay, however, to be a successful President, he needs to adjust and get out of his comfort zone.

Looking ahead to the second half of Obama’s presidency, he must become more like an “average” voter. He needs to be less scripted, and he needs to provide actions, not just a great speech, to all of the crises, and wars. He’s too protective of not messing up, and I think that is partially reflected by his falling approval rating to 45%. He’s becoming too separated from the very people that elected him. Because Democrats are likely to lose several seats in the midterm elections if Obama wants to see his approval ratings increase again, he will need to work with Republicans to accomplish what he has been good at, being a policy advocate.  A looming question in 2012 will be: What do Americans want: a policy advocate or a crisis manager?


2 Responses to President Obama: A Better Legislator or Executive?

  1. Solitude says:

    “Obama has held the symbolic principals of the office.”

    Dead wrong.

    The Commander in chief has typicaly been expected to do things like…oh…Honor Americas war dead at our most prestigious veterens cemetary (At a place called Arlington National Cemetary your American Presidency class glossed over) on Memorial Day – a holiday specifically made for that purpose. Going on a vacation back to your home town with a hasty speech given elsewhere does not fulfil that function.

    The President is also expected to salute the National Ensign (that woild be that flag with the stars and bars) whenever the Star Spangled Banner is played (Another omission from your American Presidency class evidently).

    Regarding the Symbolic duties of the office, Obama has been an epic fail.

    • craigs2040 says:

      My American Presidency class was taken as an undergraduate, in the January-May of 2008. This was well before Obama was elected. Later on in my post, I point out that I wish he would spend more time with the troops that are serving abroad, and it’s incredibly important for him to honor the fallen soldiers from all generations, I agree.

      Personally, I believe that it’s right to follow the custom of putting your hand over your heart during the national anthem or Pledge of Allegiance. I think it’s unfortunate that President Obama hasn’t followed these customary procedures to the fullest extent as previous presidents have done. However, I think it falls under a same frustration of mine when people don’t take off their hats at baseball games during the national anthem. Are those people (often my age) unpatriotic for not taking off their hats? That’s not for me to judge. On the same token, is this an excuse for the nation’s highest elected official to not follow tradition with paying respect to the anthem or flag? No.

      Thanks for the comment and thoughts!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: